4.7 Other kinds of limit
Limit at infinity
The ‘limit at infinity’ of a function tells us how behaves for large values of .
Let be an interval which is not bounded above and . We say converges to as if for all , there exists some (which in general depends on ) such that
In this case, we write or as .
Definition 4.64 is clearly very similar to the - definition of a limit of a sequence. Indeed, the following example shows how proofs based on this “-” definition look very similar to the “-” proofs from Chapter 2.
.
Let be given and choose . If , then
Hence, by the - definition of a limit, . ∎
By arguing from the definition, show that .
One way to interpret the result of Example 4.65 is that the function grows much faster than the function , which means that the ratio gets very small for large values of .
A key property of the exponential is that it grows very quickly as gets large: faster than any polynomial! On the other hand, the natural logarithm function grows very slowly: slower than any power! From this, we expect, for instance,
In order to prove statements such as those in (4.13), we introduce the following lemma which describes the behaviour of and for large values of .
Let and . Then there exists , , depending on and , such that
-
1
for all ;
-
2
for all .
Here the word ‘asymptotics’ is used to mean ‘behaviour for large values of or ’. To illustrate Lemma 4.67 (i), take and . Then we see that there exists some such that for all . In other words, eventually (that is, for all values of ), the function is much larger (by a factor of ) than the function . Similarly, Lemma 4.67 (ii) tells us that eventually the function is much smaller than the function . These relationships are illustrated in Figure 4.18.
Fix and .
1. By the definition (4.2) of the exponential function,
where we have used the fact that all the summands are non-negative. If we set , then it immediately follows that for all , as required.
2. By applying part 1 with replaced with , there exists some such that
Substituting yields
Since is an increasing function, if we set and choose , then for all , which rearranges to give the desired inequality. ∎
We can now use Lemma 4.67 to prove limit identities involving and .
.
Let be given. By Lemma 4.67, there exists some such that for all . If , then
Hence, by the - definition of a limit, . ∎
Show that
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
.
One-sided limits
Consider the function illustrated in Figure 4.19. We can see this has a discontinuity at . However, if we imagine approaching from the left-hand side by considering for larger and larger values of satisfying , then the function does appear to converge to a limit, corresponding to the solid blue dot at .
To make this idea precise, we introduce the notion of a one-sided limit.
Let be an interval and . Let where either or .
-
1
Suppose is not the left endpoint of . We say converges to from the left if for all , there exists some such that
In this case, we write or as .
-
2
Suppose is not the right endpoint of . We say converges to from the right if for all , there exists some such that
In this case, we write or as .
Left-hand limit. Let be given and choose . If , then
Hence by the - definition of a one-sided limit.
Right-hand limit. Let be given and choose . If , then
Here we used the fact that , which implies that , and the fact that , which implies that .
Hence by the - definition of a one-sided limit.
One-sided limits are related to regular limits of functions via the result of the following exercise.
Let be an interval and . Assume is not an endpoint of . Let where either or . Show that the following are equivalent:
-
1.
The limit exists and satisfies ;
-
2.
The left limit and the right limit both exist and satisfy
This characterisation is often convenient for showing limits do not exist, by demonstrating a discrepancy between the left and right limits.
Consider the function as in Example 4.71. As we saw above, the left and right-hand limits of at both exist but
Since the one-sided limits do not agree, by applying the result of Exercise 4.72, the limit does not exist.
Let be given by
Determine whether each of the limits , and exist and (if they do exist) compute their values. Is continuous at ?
Hint: is tricky (but will become easier once we’ve studied the limit laws). As the first step, try to use the fact is continuous.
Tending to infinity
The function blows up as approaches : see Figure 4.20. This is often called a vertical asymptote and is described precisely using another kind of limit.
Let be an interval, and . We say tends to as tends to if for all there exists some such that
In this case, we write or as .
As always, here ‘’ is merely part of the notation. It is just a symbol and does not represent a number or any other mathematical object.
Give an informal explanation of what it means for and match it to the precise definition by filling in the following table.
| - definition (4.4) | Informal idea |
| For all | |
| there exists some | |
| such that if satisfies , | |
| then . |
For , we may write
Suppose . From this we can deduce that , so and therefore . Thus in this case,
Let be given and choose . If , then and so it follows by our earlier observations that
Since was chosen arbitrarily, by definition . ∎
Verify the following limit identities.
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
.
There are many other kinds of limit, some of which can be obtained by mixing and matching existing definitions. Rather than write out a comprehensive list, we leave you to think about how you would go about formalising the definitions.
Let be an interval and . Assume is not an endpoint of and let . Write down a sensible definition of what it means for the following to hold.
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
;
-
(iii)
.
Write down a sensible definition of what it means for to satisfy the following.
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
.
Arguing from the definitions you came up with in Exercise 4.80 and Exercise 4.81, verify the following limit identities.
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
;
-
(iii)
.
Limit laws
There are versions of the limit laws for each kind of limit introduced above. We shall not write out formal theorem statements of all of these laws (since to do so would be rather repetitive), but content ourselves with an illustrative example.
.
Here we use the composition law to change variables. In particular, writing , we obtain
Here we have used the familiar property of the logarithm that . Strictly speaking, we have not yet shown that our definition of satisfies this property, but we shall prove this is the case in the next chapter.
Given , by Lemma 4.67 we know there exists some such that for all . Thus, for all and therefore, by the definition of a limit, .
Finally, since and as , it follows from the composition law that , as required. ∎
Show that .