The - definition of continuity bears a very close resemblance to the - definition of a limit of a sequence. In this section, we develop this connection by introducing limits of functions.
The examples in Figure4.15 show different behaviours that are possible, and are helpful for building up intuition about limits of functions as . In each case, we describe what we would intuitively expect our definition of a limit to satisfy: the functions in (a), (b) and (c) should all converge to as , but the function in (d) should not converge as .
(a) converges to as
(b) converges to as
(c) converges to as
(d) does not converge as
Figure 4.15: Examples of functions with different behaviours at the point .
One curious feature is that Figure4.15 (b) and (c) suggest that our definition of “the limit of as ” should work whether or not is defined at : the value of the limit should depend on the behaviour of the function around , but not actually at . This observation turns out to be important and useful.
With the above examples in mind, we turn to the formal definition.
Definition 4.41(Limit of a function).
Let be an interval and . Let where either or .
We say converges to as tends to if for all , there exists some (which in general depends on ) such that
In this case, we write or as .
As we shall see, Definition 4.41 turns out to be precisely what is needed to formalise our intuition from Figure4.15.
We can reinterpret continuity in terms of the notion of a limit of a function.
Indeed, for the functions in Figure4.15, we can see that the only example which is continuous at is the first one, where the limit at agrees with .
For the functions that are not continuous, either is undefined at , or the limit at does not exist.
The following lemma formalises this observation.
Let be given and choose . If satisfies , then and so . Hence,
Thus, by the - definition of a limit, .
∎
Note that while , we have . Since , it follows from the limit characterisation of continuity from Lemma4.42 that is discontinuous at .
Figure 4.16: The function from Example4.43 satisfies .
The definition of the limit also has the additional flexibility that it does not require to be defined at . We illustrate why this can be useful in the following example.
(a)The function is defined on . There is a conspicuous ‘hole’ in the graph.
(b)The function is formed by extending the definition of to by ‘filling in the hole’.
Figure 4.17: The function from Example4.44 and its continuous extension .
Example 4.44.
Consider the function
see Figure4.17. Although we have not defined at , we can nevertheless define the limit of as . In particular, we claim that .
Proof.
Let and recall from Lemma4.32 that . Taking reciprocals and multiplying through by , we obtain
This implies that
(4.8)(4.8)
A similar argument shows that (4.8) also holds for .
By Lemma4.33, the function is continuous and so given , there exists some such that if , then . Set . If , then (4.8) implies that
Hence, by the - definition of a limit, .
∎
Example 4.45.
In light of Example4.44, it makes sense to extend to a function on defined on the whole real line and given by
Intuitively, we form by ‘filling the hole’ in the graph of . Moreover, by choosing the value , we fill in the hole in such a way that is continuous: see Figure4.17.
Exercise 4.46.
Show that .
Exercise 4.47.
Let be given by
Determine whether the limit exists. If the limit does exist, then compute its value. Is continuous at ?
Exercise 4.48.
Recall that the boundedness test for sequences states that if a limit of a sequence exists, then the sequence is bounded.
(i)
Show that the analogue of this result does not hold for limits of functions. In particular, find a function such that exists for some , but is unbounded.
(ii)
However, a local version of the boundedness test does hold. Let be an interval, and and suppose exists. Show there exists some and such that